The idea of moral responsibility at work here is a familiar one — even if its nature and grounds are somewhat elusive on philosophical reflection. Ordinary moral thought recognizes that causing (or “doing”) harm can be highly morally significant.98 A person whose action is causally responsible for some harmful outcome is connected to that outcome in a way that other people, mere bystanders, are not — and this special connection may help to explain why certain responses to that outcome (regret, guilt, apology, compensation, and so on) are fitting or even obligatory for the person in question, while no such response would be fitting or obligatory for a mere bystander.99 But mere causal responsibility alone (sometimes called outcome responsibility100) is inadequate to render onerous affective responses such as guilt fitting, or onerous practical responses such as compensation obligatory — for that, something more is required.
Лина Пивоварова (редактор отдела Мир)
。关于这个话题，黑料提供了深入分析
这种极度的风险厌恶，正是导致经济陷入长期停滞陷阱的心理根源。最棘手的是，一旦这种宏大叙事在集体记忆中扎根，想要通过常规的货币或财政政策来扭转它将变得异常困难，因为人们已经对政策刺激产生了免疫和怀疑。
ВВС США призвали Израиль наносить сильные удары по Ирану20:51